|
Post by Steve Gardner on Feb 26, 2008 14:21:55 GMT
The Pentagon Flyover - How They Pulled It Off Citizen Investigation Team 1 hr 40 min 9 sec - 25 Feb 2008 www.thepentacon.comThe Pentagon Flyover - How They Pulled It Off[gvid]-8176286327617173136[/gvid] Description from Google VideoIn this presentation Citizen Investigation Team reveals brand new independently obtained smoking gun evidence further exposing how the true flight path of the Pentagon attack jet is irreconcilable with all official reports and data. We demonstrate how the plane flew over Washington DC skies and came from the east side of the Potomac River. We explain how the C-130 and white E4B or "mystery plane" were used as cover for the decoy jet that was meant to fool people into believing it hit the building. We expose the methodology behind the operation and demonstrate how they were able to successfully pull off this military deception in broad daylight. See www.ThePentaCon.com for more information.
|
|
teddy
Established Member
Posts: 101
|
Post by teddy on Feb 27, 2008 11:18:56 GMT
Some interesting information in this video, and these guys have really done the groundwork. Still, I was somewhat confused by the end of it, and perhaps none-the-wiser.
|
|
|
Post by Steve Gardner on Feb 27, 2008 12:02:12 GMT
I agree and I have discussed this with Craig Ranke and Aldo Marquis - the CIT team - elsewhere. From my perspective, the CIT's hypothesis is potentially undone by the same logic they use to defend it.
For example, they argue that, since they have witnesses that place the flightpath of AA77 (or a similarly-sized aircraft) to the north of what was the Citgo station, this proves the plane could not have impacted the Pentagon in the manner consistent with the physical evidence.
But then they dismiss the witness statement of a guy who said he actually saw the plane hit the Pentagon (very, very few witnesses actually saw the impact), which supports the south flightpath, since the impact could not have been caused by a plane flying to the north of the Citgo.
There's definitely something amiss with the official account here, not just becasue of the work CIT are doing, but also because of the discoveries Pilots for 9/11 Truth have made from their analysis of the flght data recorder.
I just wonder whether either team will be able to prove, definitively, that AA77 didn't hit the Pentagon.
|
|