Post by Steve Gardner on Dec 1, 2007 14:34:43 GMT
It seems that the 'radical cleric', Muqtada al-Sadr, has done the US and its coalition of the willing a big favour - according to Rasmussen Reports, '47% of Americans now say the U.S. and its allies are winning the War on Terror'.
A comparison of Rasmussen's historical data with that of the Iraq Coalition Casualty Count (ICCC) of Iraqi security forces and civilian deaths shows us why al-Sadr might have played a bigger part in this rising sense of optimism than the White House would care to admit.
Month - Rasmussen - ICCC
Nov 47% - 544
Oct 43% - 679
Sep 39% - 848
Aug 39% - 1674
Jul 36% - 1690
Jun 36% - 1345
May 36% - 1980
Apr 37% - 1821
Mar 38% - 2977
Feb 36% - 3014
Jan 37% - 1802
So how, you might ask, does al-Sadr figure in all of this? Well, you'll recall that in January, Bush announced his new strategy for Iraq - 'The New Way Forward'.
The administration is now attributing the recent sharp and sustained drop in all forms of violence, which has resulted in the reduction of dead and wounded troops and civilians, to this 'troop surge'.
As you can see from the data above, the troop surge led to an initial rise in security forces and civilian deaths, but by September the policy appeared to be paying dividends. It is no doubt in part because of this that the US population is feeling 'happier' with the way things are going in Iraq.
But just about everybody seems to have fortgotten the announcement on August 29th that al-Sadr had 'ordered his militia to suspend offensive operations for six months'. The following month, the ICCC reported a reduction in Iraqi security forces and civilian deaths of almost exactly 50%. Military deaths have also now dropped to their lowest level in since September 2003 and the number of US wounded dropped by 34% between August and September.
A comparison of Rasmussen's historical data with that of the Iraq Coalition Casualty Count (ICCC) of Iraqi security forces and civilian deaths shows us why al-Sadr might have played a bigger part in this rising sense of optimism than the White House would care to admit.
Month - Rasmussen - ICCC
Nov 47% - 544
Oct 43% - 679
Sep 39% - 848
Aug 39% - 1674
Jul 36% - 1690
Jun 36% - 1345
May 36% - 1980
Apr 37% - 1821
Mar 38% - 2977
Feb 36% - 3014
Jan 37% - 1802
So how, you might ask, does al-Sadr figure in all of this? Well, you'll recall that in January, Bush announced his new strategy for Iraq - 'The New Way Forward'.
...America will change our strategy to help the Iraqis carry out their campaign to put down sectarian violence and bring security to the people of Baghdad. This will require increasing American force levels. So I've committed more than 20,000 additional American troops to Iraq. The vast majority of them -- five brigades -- will be deployed to Baghdad. These troops will work alongside Iraqi units and be embedded in their formations. Our troops will have a well-defined mission: to help Iraqis clear and secure neighborhoods, to help them protect the local population, and to help ensure that the Iraqi forces left behind are capable of providing the security that Baghdad needs.
The administration is now attributing the recent sharp and sustained drop in all forms of violence, which has resulted in the reduction of dead and wounded troops and civilians, to this 'troop surge'.
As you can see from the data above, the troop surge led to an initial rise in security forces and civilian deaths, but by September the policy appeared to be paying dividends. It is no doubt in part because of this that the US population is feeling 'happier' with the way things are going in Iraq.
But just about everybody seems to have fortgotten the announcement on August 29th that al-Sadr had 'ordered his militia to suspend offensive operations for six months'. The following month, the ICCC reported a reduction in Iraqi security forces and civilian deaths of almost exactly 50%. Military deaths have also now dropped to their lowest level in since September 2003 and the number of US wounded dropped by 34% between August and September.