Post by Steve Gardner on Mar 15, 2008 23:35:29 GMT
Here's a video called We Are CHANGE Confronts Larry Silverstein, filmed by... er, WeAreCHANGE.
The claim being made is that they made Silverstein squirm at a recent public event. Whilst Silverstein clearly does get pissed off, I don't agree that they really did manage to ruffle his feathers at all.
There was, however, one new piece of information about what caused the collapse of WTC-7. Silverstein responds to one question by claiming that the antenna atop the WTC-1 - the second of the twin towers to collapse - fell into WTC-7 and gouged the facade, severing fuel lines, which led to the outbreak of fires.
Now I've been following developments on the collapse of ths building for some years and this is the first time I'd heard anything about the antenna. It got me wondering whether this is going to be the angle NIST takes when it tries to convince us that the building wasn't demolished. If so, then this very clear link between Silverstein and a much-delayed NIST work-in-progress is interesting.
Anyway, here's the vid.
The claim being made is that they made Silverstein squirm at a recent public event. Whilst Silverstein clearly does get pissed off, I don't agree that they really did manage to ruffle his feathers at all.
There was, however, one new piece of information about what caused the collapse of WTC-7. Silverstein responds to one question by claiming that the antenna atop the WTC-1 - the second of the twin towers to collapse - fell into WTC-7 and gouged the facade, severing fuel lines, which led to the outbreak of fires.
Now I've been following developments on the collapse of ths building for some years and this is the first time I'd heard anything about the antenna. It got me wondering whether this is going to be the angle NIST takes when it tries to convince us that the building wasn't demolished. If so, then this very clear link between Silverstein and a much-delayed NIST work-in-progress is interesting.
Anyway, here's the vid.
