|
Post by Steve Gardner on Feb 5, 2008 12:23:32 GMT
...Condemned Vegas Casino BuildingsSource: Breitbart TVAn audio excerpt from an interview between Alex Jones and Willie Nelson. Nelson says: "I saw those towers fall and I've seen an implosion in Las Vegas - there's too much similarities between the two, and I saw a building fall that didn't get hit by nothing." In an of itself, this is meaningless. But Nelson joins a growing list of public figures who now openly question the official account of 9/11. That doesn't mean, of course, that many of them are qualified to assert what did happen. But they are certainly entitled to question an account that is clearly inadequate.
|
|
|
Post by RedRepublic on Feb 7, 2008 18:17:34 GMT
The Twin Towers didn't inplode. A plane flew into them.
End of.
|
|
teddy
Established Member
Posts: 101
|
Post by teddy on Feb 7, 2008 21:02:37 GMT
I don't think they imploded, although I do think they exploded. WTC 7, on the other hand, seems clearly to be an implosion, a perfect one at that.
|
|
|
Post by Steve Gardner on Feb 7, 2008 21:26:16 GMT
The Twin Towers didn't inplode. A plane flew into them. Unsure about part one. Agree with part two. Whilst I am deeply sceptical about what really did happen on 9/11, I do not for one second subscribe to the belief, as some do, that holograms were used. Far from it. Every so-called investigation into what happened is flawed and riddled with errors, lies and cover-ups. I am happy to eleborate if you want me to, but for now, consider the following document, which shows that calculations carried out in 1964 revealed the WTC towers would suffer only local damage from the impact of a Boeing 707 travelling at 600mph. Now although a 707 was a smaller plane, the estimated impact speed and thus kinetic energy imparted would have been considerably greater than that of the 757 which did crash.
|
|