Post by Steve Gardner on Dec 29, 2007 0:17:38 GMT
The PentaCon (Smoking Gun Version with added subtitles)
Citizen Investigation Team
1 hr 20 min 38 sec - 8 Jun 2007
www.thepentacon.com
The PentaCon (Smoking Gun Version with added subtitles)
[gvid]-5296595694237574426[/gvid]
Description from Google Video
Opening text: We bring you the following presentation as concerned citizens who simply gathered the information for research purposes and had no intentions of ever producing a documentary. To this day we have no aspirations to be filmmakers; but after obtaining this extremely important testimony we have determined that a documentary would be the best way to present this information of critical importance to the public. However there was no film crew, expensive equipment, or budget involved. The video and audio quality is inferior so we are releasing this updated version with subtitles added when necessary. The testimony you are about to view is of historical significance and is not presented for entertainment purposes. It has been edited as little as possible to maintain the integrity of the witness claims in complete context. Because of this the interviews may seem longer than typical for a produced documentary so we do not recommend viewing for those with short attention spans.
Since the internet release of this data in February of 2007 critics have been quick to point out the fact that all 3 witnesses at the gas station believed the plane impacted the building despite our claim that their testimony proves it did not. We understand how this may be confusing for some people but the fact remains that it is physically impossible for the witnesses to be correct in their placement of the plane while also being correct in their belief that it hit the building. As a viewer of this testimony who is or will soon be aware of the trajectory of the perfectly aligned physical damage beginning with the light poles and ending with the alleged C ring exit hole; you must decide which claim you choose to believe because it is clear that both claims can not be simultaneously correct. Pay special attention to this testimony with this question in mind.
This movie gives you the necessary data to make an educated decision. Try to forget about the implications in order to remove yourself from any biases when considering the answer to this critical question. Think of yourself as a member of a jury whose responsibility it is to determine which part of the testimony you determine to be correct.
Are the witnesses correct in their placement of the plane on the north side of the station or in their belief that it hit the building?
Citizen Investigation Team
1 hr 20 min 38 sec - 8 Jun 2007
www.thepentacon.com
The PentaCon (Smoking Gun Version with added subtitles)
[gvid]-5296595694237574426[/gvid]
Description from Google Video
Opening text: We bring you the following presentation as concerned citizens who simply gathered the information for research purposes and had no intentions of ever producing a documentary. To this day we have no aspirations to be filmmakers; but after obtaining this extremely important testimony we have determined that a documentary would be the best way to present this information of critical importance to the public. However there was no film crew, expensive equipment, or budget involved. The video and audio quality is inferior so we are releasing this updated version with subtitles added when necessary. The testimony you are about to view is of historical significance and is not presented for entertainment purposes. It has been edited as little as possible to maintain the integrity of the witness claims in complete context. Because of this the interviews may seem longer than typical for a produced documentary so we do not recommend viewing for those with short attention spans.
Since the internet release of this data in February of 2007 critics have been quick to point out the fact that all 3 witnesses at the gas station believed the plane impacted the building despite our claim that their testimony proves it did not. We understand how this may be confusing for some people but the fact remains that it is physically impossible for the witnesses to be correct in their placement of the plane while also being correct in their belief that it hit the building. As a viewer of this testimony who is or will soon be aware of the trajectory of the perfectly aligned physical damage beginning with the light poles and ending with the alleged C ring exit hole; you must decide which claim you choose to believe because it is clear that both claims can not be simultaneously correct. Pay special attention to this testimony with this question in mind.
This movie gives you the necessary data to make an educated decision. Try to forget about the implications in order to remove yourself from any biases when considering the answer to this critical question. Think of yourself as a member of a jury whose responsibility it is to determine which part of the testimony you determine to be correct.
Are the witnesses correct in their placement of the plane on the north side of the station or in their belief that it hit the building?
