Post by Steve Gardner on Dec 29, 2007 10:26:10 GMT
These vehicle rental agreements were used by the FBI to help establish the movements of the alleged pilot of Flight 11, Mohamed Atta. However, they raise more questions than answers, particularly document 3.
This document is troublesome for the mainstream 9/11 story.
Firstly, it shows the car was returned at 5:00 p.m. (see 'Totals' box toward the upper right). The problem here is that all of the alleged hijackers had long since left Florida by that time.
The second problem is less a logical one and more a case of "why would he do that?" It's a simple point: why did Atta allegedly return and pay for the car at all? After all, he was planning to fly a plane into the World Trade Center within 48 hours. He had, on his other agreements, simply telephoned and extended the agreement term if he needed more than the original week. Why not do the same here? It doesn't make any sense.
This document is troublesome for the mainstream 9/11 story.
Firstly, it shows the car was returned at 5:00 p.m. (see 'Totals' box toward the upper right). The problem here is that all of the alleged hijackers had long since left Florida by that time.
The second problem is less a logical one and more a case of "why would he do that?" It's a simple point: why did Atta allegedly return and pay for the car at all? After all, he was planning to fly a plane into the World Trade Center within 48 hours. He had, on his other agreements, simply telephoned and extended the agreement term if he needed more than the original week. Why not do the same here? It doesn't make any sense.
