Post by Steve Gardner on Apr 20, 2008 19:29:45 GMT
...Official Government Reports on the World Trade Center Destruction
Difficult to know just how significant this might prove to be. It looks to be a re-hash of well-known themes, but it has the alleged benefit (for once) of being peer reviewed.
Naturally, the arguments being had in forums elsewhere deal with the publisher's credibility rather than that of the material being presented.
The paper is only available as a .pdf file for now, so here's the link and abstract.
Source: Fourteen Points of Agreement with Official Government Reports on the World Trade Center Destruction (available through Bentham Science Publishing)
Difficult to know just how significant this might prove to be. It looks to be a re-hash of well-known themes, but it has the alleged benefit (for once) of being peer reviewed.
Naturally, the arguments being had in forums elsewhere deal with the publisher's credibility rather than that of the material being presented.
The paper is only available as a .pdf file for now, so here's the link and abstract.
Source: Fourteen Points of Agreement with Official Government Reports on the World Trade Center Destruction (available through Bentham Science Publishing)
Abstract:
Reports by FEMA and NIST lay out the official account of the destruction of the World Trade Center on 9/11/2001. In this Letter, we wish to set a foundation for productive discussion and understanding by focusing on those areas where we find common ground with FEMA and NIST, while at the same time countering several popular myths about the WTC collapses.
