|
Post by Steve Gardner on May 30, 2008 8:38:14 GMT
Is the New World Order really a 'religion'? Take a look at Blair's comments in the final paragraph of this extract from the BBC. Clearly, for 'globalisation' we should read 'New World Order'. And his reference to 'faith', which is really another word for 'compliant', made me think of the ' cuddle chemical'. All very tenuous, I know. But sometimes these strands need to appear to be disparate and unconnected in order for them to work together with maximum effect. Blair 'to devote life to faith'
Former prime minister Tony Blair has promised to "spend the rest of my life" uniting the world's religions
He said faith could be a "civilising force in globalisation", bringing people together to solve problems such as malaria and extreme poverty.
Mr Blair, who is now a peace envoy to the Middle East, told Time magazine that religious belief had given him "strength" while in power.
He is launching a "faith foundation" in New York on Friday.
Mr Blair, who recently converted to Catholicism, said: "Faith is part of our future, and faith and the values it brings with it are an essential part of making globalisation work."
|
|
teddy
Established Member
Posts: 101
|
Post by teddy on May 30, 2008 20:44:53 GMT
There's no doubt in my mind that this has to do with the New World Order. However, I don't think the NWO = a faith. Rather, this is just another step in unifying the world. We are already becoming one world through Europe, UN and Globalisation. Now it's time to make the faiths get along otherwise the NWO will never happen. Aaron Russo (who knew one of the Rockerfellers) said that they didn't know what to do aboutg the Israel-Palestine problem as it was out of their control. This kind of action will perhaps help towards solving the issue. I think the idea now is to make the NWO the solution to the wars we have today. A bit like with the UN was started in the first place, to stop wars ever happening again.
|
|